4.5 Article

Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis

Journal

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 1062-1068

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2059-0

Keywords

Scoliosis; Cobb angle; Smartphone; iPhone; Measurement variability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Cobb technique is the universally accepted method for measuring the severity of spinal deformities. Traditionally, Cobb angles have been measured using protractor and pencil on hardcopy radiographic films. The new generation of mobile 'smartphones' make accurate angle measurement possible using an integrated accelerometer, providing a potentially useful clinical tool for assessing Cobb angles. The purpose of this study was to compare Cobb angle measurements performed using a smartphone and traditional protractor in a series of 20 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Seven observers measured major Cobb angles on 20 pre-operative postero-anterior radiographs of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis patients with both a standard protractor and using an Apple iPhone. Five of the observers repeated the measurements at least a week after the original measurements. The mean absolute difference between pairs of smartphone/protractor measurements was 2.1A degrees, with a small (1A degrees) bias toward lower Cobb angles with the iPhone. 95% confidence intervals for intra-observer variability were +/- 3.3A degrees for the protractor and +/- 3.9A degrees for the iPhone. 95% confidence intervals for inter-observer variability were +/- 8.3A degrees for the iPhone and +/- 7.1A degrees for the protractor. Both of these confidence intervals were within the range of previously published Cobb measurement studies. We conclude that the iPhone is an equivalent Cobb measurement tool to the manual protractor, and measurement times are about 15% less. The widespread availability of inclinometer-equipped mobile phones and the ability to store measurements in later versions of the angle measurement software may make these new technologies attractive for clinical measurement applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available