4.6 Article

Drug resistance beyond extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: individual patient data meta-analysis

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 169-179

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00136312

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Stop TB Department of the World Health Organization through USAID
  2. State of California from the Centers for Disease Control Cooperative Agreement Funds
  3. Mexico (Veracruz) from the Mexican Secretariat of Health
  4. National Institutes of Health of the United States [A135969, K01TW000001]
  5. Wellcome Trust [176W009]
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute [55000632]
  7. Mexican Council of Science and Technology [SEP 2004-001-47499, FOSSIS 2005-2 (14475), 87332]
  8. South Africa from the South African Medical Research Council
  9. Fonds de Recherche en Sante de Quebec
  10. European Community [FP7-223681]
  11. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  12. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The broadest pattern of tuberculosis (TB) drug resistance for which a consensus definition exists is extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-TB. It is not known if additional drug resistance portends worsened patient outcomes. This study compares treatment outcomes of XDR-TB patients with and without additional resistance in order to explore the need for a new definition. Individual patient data on XDR-TB outcomes were included in a meta-analysis comparing outcomes between XDR alone and three nonmutually exclusive XDR-TB patient groups: XDR plus resistance to all the second-line injectables (sli) and capreomycin and kanamycin/amikacin (XDR+2sli) XDR plus resistance to second-line injectables and to more than one group 4 drug, i.e. ethionamide/protionamide, cydoserine/terizidone or para-aminosalicylic acid (XDR+sliG4) and XDR+sliG4 plus resistance to ethambutol and/or pyrazinamide (XDR+sliG4EZ). Of 405 XDR-TB cases, 301 were XDR alone, 68 XDR+2sli, 48 XDR+sliG4 and 42 XDR+sliG4EZ. In multivariate analysis, the odds of cure were significantly lower in XDR+2sli (adjusted OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8) compared to XDR alone, while odds of failure and death were higher in all XDR patients with additional resistance (adjusted OR 2.6-2.8). Patients with additional resistance beyond XDR-TB showed poorer outcomes. Limitations in availability, accuracy and reproducibility of current drug susceptibility testing methods preclude the adoption of a useful definition beyond the one currently used for XDR-TB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available