4.6 Review

The safety of human pluripotent stem cells in clinical treatment

Journal

ANNALS OF MEDICINE
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 370-380

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2015.1051579

Keywords

Epigenetic aberrations; good manufacturing practices; human embryonic stem cells (hESCs); human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs); human nuclear transfer embryonic stem cells (NT-ESCs); human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs); immune rejection; parthenogenetic human embryonic stem cells (phESCs); stem cell bank; tumorigenicity

Funding

  1. Karolinska Institutets Forskningsstiftelser [2014fobi41924]
  2. Karolinska University Hospital
  3. Russian Science Foundation (RSF), Russian Federation [14-15-00712]
  4. Foundation for Assistance to Small Innovative Enterprises (FASIE), Russian Federation [24026]
  5. Russian Science Foundation [14-15-00712] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) have practically unlimited proliferation potential and a capability to differentiate into any cell type in the human body. Since the first derivation in 1998, they have been an attractive source of cells for regenerative medicine. Numerous ethical, technological, and regulatory complications have been hampering hPSC use in clinical applications. Human embryonic stem cells (ESCs), parthenogenetic human ESCs, human nuclear transfer ESCs, and induced pluripotent stem cells are four types of hPSCs that are different in many clinically relevant features such as propensity to epigenetic abnormalities, generation methods, and ability for development of autologous cell lines. Propensity to genetic mutations and tumorigenicity are common features of all pluripotent cells that complicate hPSC-based therapies. Several recent advances in methods of derivation, culturing, and monitoring of hPSCs have addressed many ethical concerns and technological challenges in development of clinical-grade hPSC lines. Generation of banks of such lines may be useful to minimize immune rejection of hPSC-derived allografts. In this review, we discuss different sources of hPSCs available at the moment, various safety risks associated with them, and possible solutions for successful use of hPSCs in the clinic. We also discuss ongoing clinical trials of hPSC-based treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available