4.6 Article

Maternal use of folic acid supplements during pregnancy, and childhood respiratory health and atopy

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1468-1474

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00094511

Keywords

Asthma; atopy; pregnancy; prospective; respiratory tract infections; wheeze

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  3. Netherlands Asthma Fund
  4. Netherlands Ministry of Spatial Planning, Housing and the Environment
  5. Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies have suggested possible adverse side-effects of maternal use of folic acid-containing supplements (FACSs) during pregnancy on wheeze and asthma in early childhood. We investigated the association between maternal use of FACSs and childhood respiratory health and atopy in the first 8 yrs of life. Data on maternal use of FACSs, collected during pregnancy, were available for 3,786 children participating in the Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy birth cohort study. Questionnaire data on children's respiratory and allergic symptoms were collected annually and allergic sensitisation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) were measured at 8 yrs of age. No overall (from 1 to 8 yrs of age) associations were observed between maternal use of FACSs and (frequent) asthma symptoms, wheeze, lower respiratory tract infection, frequent respiratory tract infection and eczema. Maternal folic acid use was associated with wheeze at 1 yr of age (prevalence ratio 1.20, 95% Cl 1.04-1.39), but not with wheeze at later ages. Pre-natal exposure to FACSs was not associated with sensitisation and BHR. Apart from a small increased risk of early wheeze, we observed no adverse respiratory or allergic outcomes associated with pre-natal FACSs exposure in our study population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available