4.6 Article

Prognostic implications of intraventricular conduction delays in a general population: The Health 2000 Survey

Journal

ANNALS OF MEDICINE
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 74-80

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2014.985704

Keywords

Bundle branch block; electrocardiography; prognosis; ventricular conduction disturbance

Funding

  1. Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility area of Tampere University Hospital
  2. Hospital District of South Ostrobothnia, Seinajoki, Finland
  3. Signe Niemisto Legacy Fund, Seinajoki, Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. We examined the prognostic impact of eight different intraventricular conduction delays (IVCD) in the standard electrocardiogram (ECG) in a community cohort. Methods and results. Data were collected from 6299 Finnish individuals. During a mean 8.2 years (interquartile range 8.1 to 8.3) of follow-up 640 subjects died (10.2%); 277 (4.4%) were cardiovascular deaths. For both sexes, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was higher in subjects with IVCD than in those without. In Cox regression analysis after adjustment for age and gender, the hazard ratio for cardiovascular mortality for non-specifi c IVCD was 4.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.95-9.26, P < 0.0001) and for left bundle branch block (LBBB) 2.11 (95% CI 1.31-3.41, P = 0.002). Right bundle branch block (RBBB) was not related to additional mortality, while incomplete RBBB (IRBBB) presented a hazard ratio of 2.24 (95% CI 1.064-4.77, P = 0.036). Conclusions. In the general population, non-specifi c IVCD, LBBB, and IRBBB were associated with increased relative risk for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. RBBB did not have an impact on cardiovascular mortality either in subjects with or without previous heart disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available