4.6 Article

Is INTERdisciplinary COMmunity-based COPD management (INTERCOM) cost-ffective?

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 79-87

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00043309

Keywords

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; community-based; cost-effectiveness; pulmonary rehabilitation; quality-adjusted life years

Funding

  1. Netherlands Asthma Foundation (NAF) [3.4.01.63]
  2. Stichting Astma Bestrijding (SAB
  3. Amsterdam, the Netherlands)
  4. Nutricia Netherlands
  5. Pfizer
  6. Care Solutions (PICASSO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of interdisciplinary community-based chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management in patients with COPD. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a 2-yr randomised controlled trial, in which 199 patients with less advanced airflow obstruction and impaired exercise capacity were assigned to the INTERCOM programme or usual care. The INTERCOM programme consisted of exercise training, education, nutritional therapy and smoking cessation counselling offered by community-based physiotherapists and dieticians and hospital-based respiratory nurses. All-cause resource use during 2 yrs was obtained by self-report and from hospital and pharmacy records. Health outcomes were the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), exacerbations and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The INTERCOM group had 30% (95% CI 3-56%) more patients with a clinically relevant improvement in SGRQ total score, 0.08 (95% CI -0.01-0.18) more QALYs per patient, but a higher mean number of exacerbations, 0.84 (95% CI -0.07-1.78). Mean total 2-yr costs were (sic)2,751 (95% CI -(sic)632-(sic)6,372) higher for INTERCOM than for usual care, which resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of (sic)9,078 per additional patient with a relevant improvement in SGRQ or (sic)32,425 per QALY. INTERCOM significantly improved disease-specific quality of life, but did not affect exacerbation rate. The cost per QALY ratio was moderate, but within the range of that generally considered to be acceptable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available