4.6 Article

Right ventricular contractility in systemic sclerosis-associated and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 1160-1166

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00135407

Keywords

myocardial contraction; pump function graph; right ventricular function; right ventricular pressure; stroke volume

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since systemic sclerosis (SSc) also involves the heart, the aim of the present study was to evaluate possible differences in right ventricular (RV) pump function between SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH; SScPAH) and idiopathic PAH (IPAH). In 13 limited cutaneous SScPAH and 17 IPAH patients, RV pump function was described using the pump function graph, which relates mean RV pressure ((P) over bar RV) and stroke volume index (SVI). Differences in pump function result in shift or rotation of the pump function graph. (P) over bar RV and SVI were measured using standard catheterisation. The hypothetical isovolumic (P) over bar RV ((P) over bar RV,iso) was estimated using a single-beat method. The pump function graph was approximated by a parabola: (P) over bar RV=(P) over bar RV,iso[1-(SVI/SVImax)(2)], where SVImax is the hypothetical maximal SVI at zero (P) over bar RV, enabling calculation of SVImax. There were no differences in SVI and SVImax. Both (P) over bar RV and (P) over bar RV,iso were significantly lower in SScPAH than in IPAH ((P) over bar RV 30.7 +/- 8.5 versus 41.2 +/- 9.4 mmHg; (P) over bar RV,iso 43.1 +/- 12.4 versus 53.5 +/- 10.0 mmHg). Since higher pressures were found at similar SVI, the difference in the pump function graph results from lower contractility in SScPAH than in IPAH. Right ventricular contractility is lower in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension than in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available