4.6 Article

Lung cancer gene associated with COPD: triple whammy or possible confounding effect?

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 1158-1164

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00093908

Keywords

Association study; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; confounding; lung cancer; nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; polymorphism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, several large genome-wide association studies have identified a putative lung cancer locus in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes (nAChR) on 15q25. However, these findings may be confounded by the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is also strongly associated with smoking exposure and lung cancer. This is likely as the prevalence of COPD in lung cancer cohorts is as much as two-fold greater than that reported in smoking control populations (50 versus 20%). The present authors compared the genotype frequencies of the most strongly associated single nucleotide polymorphism (rs16969968) in the alpha 5 subunit of the nAChR gene cluster between three matched smoking cohorts. The AA genotype was found to be more frequent and was seen in 437 (16%) lung cancer cases and 445 (14%) COPD cases compared with 475 (9%) healthy smoking controls. More importantly, when 429 lung cancer cases were divided according to spirometry results (performed within 3 months of diagnosis, prior to surgery and in the absence of effusions or collapse), the AA genotype was present in 19 and 11% of cases with and without COPD, respectively. These findings suggest that the association between the a5 subunit nicotinic acetylcholine receptor single nucleotide polymorphism and lung cancer may, in part, be confounded by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available