4.7 Article

Intravenous contrast injection significantly affects bone mineral density measured on CT

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 283-289

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3408-2

Keywords

Osteoporosis; Screening; Computed tomography; Contrast media; Bone mineral density

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The objective is to evaluate the effect of intravenous contrast media on bone mineral density (BMD) assessment by comparing unenhanced and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examinations performed for other indications. Methods One hundred and fifty-two patients (99 without and 53 with malignant neoplasm) who underwent both unenhanced and two contrast-enhanced (arterial and portal venous phase) abdominal CT examinations in a single session between June 2011 and July 2013 were included. BMD was evaluated on the three examinations as CT-attenuation values in Hounsfield Units (HU) in the first lumbar vertebra (L1). Results CT-attenuation values were significantly higher in both contrast-enhanced phases, compared to the unenhanced phase (p<0.01). In patients without malignancies, mean +/- standard deviation (SD) HU-values increased from 128.8 +/- 48.6 HU for the unenhanced phase to 142.3 +/- 47.2 HU for the arterial phase and 147.0 +/- 47.4 HU for the portal phase (p<0.01). In patients with malignancies, HU-values increased from 112.1 +/- 38.1 HU to 126.2 +/- 38.4 HU and 130.1 +/- 37.3 HU (p<0.02), respectively. With different thresholds to define osteoporosis, measurements in the arterial and portal phase resulted in 7-25 % false negatives. Conclusions Our study showed that intravenous contrast injection substantially affects BMD-assessment on CT and taking this into account may improve routine assessment of low BMD in nonquantitative CT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available