4.7 Article

A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 2051-2060

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2804-3

Keywords

Sensitivity and specificity; MR-mammography; Breast MRI; Classification tree; Decision tree

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the face of multiple available diagnostic criteria in MR-mammography (MRM), a practical algorithm for lesion classification is needed. Such an algorithm should be as simple as possible and include only important independent lesion features to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. This investigation aimed to develop a simple classification tree for differential diagnosis in MRM. A total of 1,084 lesions in standardised MRM with subsequent histological verification (648 malignant, 436 benign) were investigated. Seventeen lesion criteria were assessed by 2 readers in consensus. Classification analysis was performed using the chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) method. Results include the probability for malignancy for every descriptor combination in the classification tree. A classification tree incorporating 5 lesion descriptors with a depth of 3 ramifications (1, root sign; 2, delayed enhancement pattern; 3, border, internal enhancement and oedema) was calculated. Of all 1,084 lesions, 262 (40.4 %) and 106 (24.3 %) could be classified as malignant and benign with an accuracy above 95 %, respectively. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 88.4 %. The classification algorithm reduced the number of categorical descriptors from 17 to 5 (29.4 %), resulting in a high classification accuracy. More than one third of all lesions could be classified with accuracy above 95 %. aEuro cent A practical algorithm has been developed to classify lesions found in MR-mammography. aEuro cent A simple decision tree consisting of five criteria reaches high accuracy of 88.4 %. aEuro cent Unique to this approach, each classification is associated with a diagnostic certainty. aEuro cent Diagnostic certainty of greater than 95 % is achieved in 34 % of all cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available