4.7 Article

Influence of coronary artery disease prevalence on predictive values of coronary CT angiography: a meta-regression analysis

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 1904-1913

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2142-2

Keywords

Coronary disease; Computed tomography; Generalised linear mixed models; Meta-regression; Prevalence

Funding

  1. German Science Foundation (DFG) [Schl 3-1]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  3. Bayer-Schering
  4. German Heart Foundation/German Foundation of Heart Research
  5. GE Healthcare Biosciences
  6. Bracco
  7. Toshiba Medical Systems
  8. Guerbet
  9. Cardiac MR Academy Berlin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence on the predictive values of coronary CT angiography. We performed a meta-regression based on a generalised linear mixed model using the binomial distribution and a logit link to analyse the influence of the prevalence of CAD in published studies on the per-patient negative and positive predictive values of CT in comparison to conventional coronary angiography as the reference standard. A prevalence range in which the negative predictive value was higher than 90%, while at the same time the positive predictive value was higher than 70% was considered appropriate. The summary negative and positive predictive values of coronary CT angiography were 93.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.8-94.5%) and 87.5% (95% CI, 86.5-88.5%), respectively. With 95% confidence, negative and positive predictive values higher than 90% and 70% were available with CT for a CAD prevalence of 18-63%. CT systems with > 16 detector rows met these requirements for the positive (P < 0.01) and negative (P < 0.05) predictive values in a significantly broader range than systems with a parts per thousand currency sign16 detector rows. It is reasonable to perform coronary CT angiography as a rule-out test in patients with a low-to-intermediate likelihood of disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available