4.7 Article

Quantitative analysis and prediction of regional lymph node status in rectal cancer based on computed tomography imaging

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 2318-2325

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2182-7

Keywords

Quantitative analysis; Lymph node; Rectal cancer; Support vector machine (SVM); Relevance vector machine (RVM)

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [80171207, 60902076]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [10ykjcll]
  3. Guangzhou Technology Support Program [J-E151]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2010A030500004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To quantitatively evaluate regional lymph nodes in rectal cancer patients by using an automated, computer-aided approach, and to assess the accuracy of this approach in differentiating benign and malignant lymph nodes. Patients (228) with newly diagnosed rectal cancer, confirmed by biopsy, underwent enhanced computed tomography (CT). Patients were assigned to the benign node or malignant node group according to histopathological analysis of node samples. All CT-detected lymph nodes were segmented using the edge detection method, and seven quantitative parameters of each node were measured. To increase the prediction accuracy, a hierarchical model combining the merits of the support and relevance vector machines was proposed to achieve higher performance. Of the 220 lymph nodes evaluated, 125 were positive and 95 were negative for metastases. Fractal dimension obtained by the Minkowski box-counting approach was higher in malignant nodes than in benign nodes, and there was a significant difference in heterogeneity between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes. The overall performance of the proposed model is shown to have accuracy as high as 88% using morphological characterisation of lymph nodes. Computer-aided quantitative analysis can improve the prediction of node status in rectal cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available