4.7 Article

Can quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI independently characterize an ovarian mass?

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 2176-2183

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1795-6

Keywords

Adnexal mass; Indeterminate; Ovarian cancer; Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; Borderline ovarian cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our aim was to establish threshold criteria based on quantitative DCE-MRI data as independent predictors of malignancy in a complex (solid, solid/cystic) ovarian mass. The MRI of 26 lesions in 25 patients with a complex ovarian mass (age range, 17-80 years; mean 43 years) was retrospectively reviewed and correlated with histology following resection. Cases with solid tumour components, definitive histology and relevant dynamic imaging were included. These were categorised into two groups, benign (N = 14) and malignant (N = 12). Following dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, regions of interest were drawn around the solid tumour component. Maximum actual enhancement (SImax), maximum relative enhancement (SIrel), wash-in rate (WIR) and SImax (tumour)/SImax (psoas) ratio were analysed. Threshold criteria for malignancy were established. There was a significant difference in SImax (p < 0.001), SIrel (p < 0.05), WIR (p < 0.001) and SImax (tumour)/SImax (psoas) between the two groups. Optimal threshold criteria for malignancy were established; SImax a parts per thousand yen 250 or SImax (tumour)/SImax (psoas) a parts per thousand yen 2.35 divided the two groups with 100% sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Threshold criteria established in this preliminary study using quantitative DCE-MRI provide an accurate method for the prediction of malignancy, particularly in preoperative indeterminate cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available