4.7 Article

MR-lymphangiography at 3.0T-a feasibility study

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages 2771-2778

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1461-z

Keywords

MR-lymphangiography; Lymphedema; 3T; Lymphoscintigraphy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to establish and evaluate contrast-enhanced MR-lymphangiography (MRL) at 3.0T for detection and visualization of abnormalities of the peripheral lymphatic system. Sixteen patients were examined with a highly resolved isotropic T1w-3D-GRE-(FLASH) sequence (TR 3.76 ms/TE 1.45 ms/FA 30A degrees/voxel-size 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 mm(3)) at 3T after intracutaneous injection of gadolinium-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetic-acid. Two radiologists evaluated overall image quality, contrast between lymph vessels and background tissue, venous contamination, visualized levels, and fat-saturation-homogeneity on 3D maximum-intensity projections. Overall image quality was good to excellent, and all examinations were diagnostic except one, where contrast medium was injected subcutaneously instead of intracutaneously. Overall image quality was good to excellent in 12/16 cases, depiction of lymph vessels was good to excellent in 15/16 cases. Venous contamination was always present, but diagnostically problematical in only one case. Instant lymphatic drainage was observed in unaffected extremities, reaching the pelvic level after approximately 10 min. Lymphatic drainage was considerably delayed in lymphedematous extremities. Ectatic lymph vessels, entrapment, and diffuse drainage of contrast medium correlated with impaired lymphatic drainage. In conclusion, MRL at 3.0T provides very high spatial resolution and anatomical detail of normal and abnormal peripheral lymph vessels. MRL may thus become a valuable tool for microsurgical treatment planning and monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available