4.7 Article

Temperature dependence of the rigid amorphous fraction in poly(ethylene terephthalate)

Journal

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 60-68

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.06.005

Keywords

Three-phase model; Rigid amorphous fraction; Interphase; Chain mobility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The analysis of the c(p) melting curve of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) after non-isothermal crystallization, according to a three-phase enthalpy-based procedure, has allowed to monitor the correct crystalline and rigid amorphous fractions evolution during fusion at low heating rate and to identify the temperature of complete mobilization of the rigid amorphous fraction, located in the proximity of 215 degrees C. This limit temperature for the disappearance of the rigid amorphous fraction in PET corresponds to the transition between the triple and the double melting behaviour displayed by PET after isothermal crystallization. The multiple melting behaviour of PET is usually attributed to the fusion of original crystals recrystallized during the heating at conventional scanning rate, and to the presence of dual lamellar stacks. In the present study, PET was isothermally crystallized at various temperatures (T-c) ranging from 185 degrees C to 225 degrees C, and the double and triple melting profile that is observed at conventional DSC heating rates, after isothermal crystallization at T-c, higher and lower than 215 degrees C respectively, has been put in relation with the absence and the presence of RAF around the original crystal lamellae. All the experimental evidences here reported indicate that the critical temperature for the formation and the disappearance of the rigid amorphous fraction in the PET sample analyzed in the present study at conventional DSC scanning rates, is around 215 degrees C. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available