4.7 Article

Effect of electron beam irradiation on morphology and sieving characteristics of nylon-66 membranes

Journal

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
Volume 45, Issue 10, Pages 2797-2804

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.07.009

Keywords

Electron beam; Nylon-66; Crosslinking; Sieving characteristics; Nanofiltration

Funding

  1. Riau Province Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nylon-66 is a typical semicrystalline polymer that can be crosslinked through electron beam (EB) irradiation. Crosslinking can dramatically change polymer properties. The objective of this research was to observe how EB irradiation affects morphology and sieving characteristics of nylon-66 membranes. EB irradiation was carried out in air at 60, 70 and 80 kGy doses. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), swelling and gel content studies evidenced the morphological changes and crosslinking of nylon-66 membranes. Sieving characteristics were also measured using pure water permeation, and rejection of raffinose, vitamin B12, and mono- and divalent salts. These results show that nylon-66 membrane surface and permeation characteristics changed with different irradiation doses. The nylon-66 surface became denser and the gel content increased with increasing irradiation dose. Furthermore, pure water permeation decreased and small molecules were increasingly rejected with greater irradiation doses. The amount of rejection was between 33% and 88.4% for vitamin B12 and between 16% and 83% for raffinose. The highest vitamin B12 and raffinose rejection was seen with a N-80 membrane, and no rejection was measured with N-0 or N-60 membranes. Salt rejection, however, was very low, especially for NaCl, with only 10.51-46% rejected. Based on flux, permeability and uncharged solute (vitamin B12 and raffinose) rejection data, nylon-66 type N-70 and N-80 membranes were estimated to be in the nanofiltration (NF) range. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available