4.7 Article

Measurement of the atmospheric ν μ energy spectrum from 100 GeV to 200 TeV with the ANTARES telescope

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 73, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2606-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  2. Commissariat a l'energie atomique et aux energies alternatives (CEA)
  3. Agence National de la Recherche (ANR)
  4. Commission Europenne (FEDER fund)
  5. Commission Europenne (Marie Curie Program)
  6. Region Alsace (contrat CPER)
  7. Region Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azurr, France
  8. Departement du Var, France
  9. Ville de La Seyne-sur-Mer, France
  10. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Germany
  11. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Italy
  12. Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM), The Netherlands
  13. Nederlandse organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), The Netherlands
  14. Council of the President of the Russian Federation for young scientists and leading scientific schools supporting grants, Russia
  15. National Authority for Scientific Research (ANCS-UEFISCDI), Romania
  16. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN), Prometeo of Generalitat Valenciana and MultiDark, Spain
  17. Agence de l'Oriental, Morocco

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atmospheric neutrinos are produced during cascades initiated by the interaction of primary cosmic rays with air nuclei. In this paper, a measurement of the atmospheric energy spectrum in the energy range 0.1-200 TeV is presented, using data collected by the ANTARES underwater neutrino telescope from 2008 to 2011. Overall, the measured flux is similar to 25 % higher than predicted by the conventional neutrino flux, and compatible with the measurements reported in ice. The flux is compatible with a single power-law dependence with spectral index gamma (meas)=3.58 +/- 0.12. With the present statistics the contribution of prompt neutrinos cannot be established.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available