4.2 Article

Neuroprotein Dynamics in the Cerebrospinal Fluid: Intraindividual Concomitant Ventricular and Lumbar Measurements

Journal

EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 3-4, Pages 189-194

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000352032

Keywords

Biomarker; S100B; Neuron-specific enolase; beta-Trace; Neurotrauma; Neuroproteins; Cerebrospinal fluid; Ventricular drain

Funding

  1. ZNS - Hannelore Kohl Stiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective:The measurement of neuromarker/neuroproteins in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is gaining increased popularity. However, insufficient information is available on the rostrocaudal distribution of neuroproteins in the CSF to guarantee an appropriate interpretation of ventricular versus lumbar concentrations. Methods: In 10 patients treated with both an external ventricular and a lumbar CSF drain, we collected concomitant CSF samples. We measured CSF concentrations of the glial S100B protein, the neuron-specific enolase (Cobas e411 (R); Roche Diagnostics), the leptomeningeal beta-trace protein (BN Pro Spec (R); Dade Behring/Siemens), and the blood-derived albumin (Immage; Beckman Coulter). Statistical analysis was performed with a paired Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Results: In patients with a free CSF circulation without any recent neurosurgical procedure, S100B and neuron-specific enolase concentrations did not differ between the ventricular and lumbar CSF while beta-trace and albumin levels were significantly higher in the lumbar than in the ventricular CSF (p = 0.008 and p = 0.005). Following posterior fossa tumor surgery, all proteins accumulate in the lumbar CSF. Conclusion: For brain-derived proteins, we could not confirm a rostrocaudal CSF gradient while lepto-meningeal and blood-derived proteins accumulate in the lumbar CSF. We conclude that for the interpretation of protein CSF concentrations, the source of the sample is of crucial importance. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available