4.2 Article

Cognitive Effects of Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Controlled Study

Journal

EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages 361-366

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000341380

Keywords

Cognition; Deep brain stimulation; Neuropsychological testing; Parkinson's disease; Subthalamic nucleus; Verbal fluency

Funding

  1. Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED)
  2. Medtronic Iberica SA
  3. CIBERNED
  4. FIBAO
  5. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  6. Eisai
  7. Glaxo-SmithKline
  8. Italfarmaco
  9. Lundbeck
  10. Medtronic
  11. MSD
  12. Novartis
  13. Abbott
  14. UCB Pharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) improves motor function in selected patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) but can be associated with variable changes in cognitive functions. Methods: We studied 21 patients selected for STN-DBS and compared 6-month clinical and neuropsychological outcomes between those who underwent surgery (n = 9) and those who voluntarily refused it (n = 12). Results: Motor and quality of life outcomes were markedly superior in the STN-DBS group versus controls. A wide neuropsychological battery was administered, and the whole sample showed a statistically significant worsening in phonemic verbal fluency, time to perform the Trail Making Test part B, Digit Symbol score of WAIS-III and color-naming score of the Stroop Test. In comparison to controls, a trend to a slightly worse deterioration in phonemic verbal fluency was observed in the STN-DBS patients and was significantly correlated with reductions in the L-dopa-equivalent daily dose (r = 0.850, p = 0.007). Conclusion: Our study confirms the safety of STN-DBS from a cognitive standpoint; a reduction in verbal fluency at 6 months after surgery can also be related to PD progression and medication reduction. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available