4.8 Article

The Interplay of Al and Mg Speciation in Advanced Mg Battery Electrolyte Solutions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages 328-337

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b10987

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Joint Center for Energy Storage Research, an Energy Innovation Hub - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. St. Elmo Brady Future Faculty Fellowship
  4. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [NSF DGE-1144245]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mg batteries are an attractive alternative to Li-based energy storage due to the possibility of higher volumetric capacities with the added advantage of using sustainable materials. A promising emerging electrolyte for Mg batteries is the magnesium aluminum chloride complex (MACC) which shows high Mg electrodeposition and stripping efficiencies and relatively high anodic stabilities. As prepared, MACC is inactive with respect to Mg deposition; however, efficient Mg electrodeposition can be achieved following an electrolytic conditioning process. Through the use of Raman spectroscopy, surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy, Al-27 and Cl-35 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and pair distribution function analysis, we explore the active vs inactive complexes in the MACC electrolyte and demonstrate the codependence of Al and Mg speciation. These techniques report on significant changes occurring in the bulk speciation of the conditioned electrolyte relative to the as-prepared solution. Analysis shows that the active Mg complex in conditioned MACC is very likely the [Mg-2(mu-Cl)(3)center dot 6THF](+) complex that is observed in the solid state structure. Additionally, conditioning creates free Cl- in the electrolyte solution, and we suggest the free Cl- adsorbs at the electrode surface to enhance Mg electrodeposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available