4.5 Article

Body Mass Index and Primary Chronic Venous Disease A Cross-sectional Study

Journal

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.12.011

Keywords

Obesity; Chronic venous disease; Epidemiology

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science, Republic of Serbia [11141002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: This study aims to investigate whether overweight and obesity are related to the clinical (C) category of clinical, etiologic, anatomic and pathophysiologic (CEAP) classification of chronic venous disease (CVD). Design: A cross-sectional study. Materials and methods: The study was conducted in Serbia, in the year 2011. Men and women aged >18 years, consecutively coming to venous specialists because of venous problems in the legs, were included in the study. Patients demographic, anthropometric and clinical data were collected. For the analysis, univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used. Results: The study comprised 1116 subjects with primary CVD, 384 (34.4%) men and 732 (65.6%) women. Among them 464 (41.6%) were normal-weight patients (body mass index (BMI) < 25.0 kg m-2), 476 (42.7%) were overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg m-2) and 176 (15.8%) were obese (BMI > 30.0 kg m-2). According to multivariate analysis, the CEAP C category of CVD was significantly more advanced in overweight and obese patients, the association being more pronounced in obese. Compared groups did not differ in the presence of venous reflux. In univariate analysis, venous obstruction was related to overweight and obesity but this association did not substantially affect the relationship between obesity and CEAP C categories of CVD. Conclusion: The CEAP C categories of CVD were significantly related to overweight and obesity, and this association was independent of age, sex and some other postulated risk factors. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available