4.5 Article

Angiographic Restenosis and Its Clinical Impact after Infrapopliteal Angioplasty

Journal

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.07.017

Keywords

Endovascular therapy; Critical limb ischemia; Angioplasty; Angiographic restenosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess 3- and 12-month angiographic restenosis rates and their clinical impact after infrapopliteal angioplasty. Design: Prospective multicenter study. Materials and methods: We analyzed 68 critical ischemic limbs (tissue loss: 58 limbs) from 63 consecutive patients due to isolated infrapopliteal lesions who underwent angioplasty alone. Primary endpoint was 3-month angiographic restenosis rate; secondary endpoints were 12-month angiographic restenosis rate, and 3- and 12-month rates of mortality, major amputation and reintervention. Three- and 12-month frequency of ambulatory status and of freedom from ischemic symptoms, and time to wound healing in the ischemic wound group, were compared between restenotic and non-restenotic groups. Angiographic restenosis predictors were assessed by multivariable analysis. Results: 95% of cases had 3-month angiography; restenosis rate was 73%: 40% restenosis and 33% re-occlusion. Twelve-month follow-up angiography was conducted for the patients without 3-month angiographic restenosis, and restenosis rate at 12 months was 82%. Non-administration of cilostazol and statin, and chronic total occlusion were 3-month angiographic restenosis predictors. Three- and 12-month mortality was 5% and 12%, respectively. Despite no patients having undergone amputation, 15% had persistent ischemic symptoms, and 48% of limbs underwent reintervention within 12 months. During the same study period, ambulatory status and limbs with complete healing were more frequently observed in the non-restenosis group than in the restenosis group. In the tissue loss group, time to wound healing in the restenosis group was longer than in the non-restenosis group (127 days vs. 66 days, p = 0.02). Conclusion: The extremely high angiographic restenosis rate after infrapopliteal angioplasty may adversely impact clinical status improvement. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available