Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 635-642Publisher
W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.06.011
Keywords
Peripheral bypass; PTFE; Intermittent pneumatic compression; Oedema; CRP
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of A-V impulse technology (A-V) for oedema prevention and treatment following PTFE femoropopliteal surgery. Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial. Materials: 36 patients undergoing PTFE femoropopliteal bypass reconstructions, either being treated postoperatively with a compression stocking (CS) (Group-1, n = 19) or with A-V (Group-2, n = 17). Methods: Patients in treatment group-1 used a CS postoperatively during 1 week day and night, patients in group-2 were treated with A-V postoperatively at night during one week. The lower leg circumference was measured preoperatively and at five postoperative time points. Results: Limb circumference has increased postoperatively on day 1 (CS 1.5%/A-V 1.4%), on day 4 (5.7%/6.3%), on day 7 (6.6%/6.1%), on day 14 (7.9%/7.7%) and on day 90 (5.8%/5.2%). Differences between treatment groups were not significant. A re-operation gives a significant 3.9% increase in circumference as compared to a first operation (95% CI: 1.5-6.4%; p = 0.002). Conclusion: No significant differences were found in the extent of developed edema between the groups following PTFE femoropopliteal bypass surgery. A redo peripheral bypass operation results in significantly more postoperative oedema than a first-time performed bypass operation. (C) 2010 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available