4.5 Article

Is There a Benefit of Frequent CT Follow-up After EVAR?

Journal

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.12.019

Keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA); Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR); Computed tomography (CT); Follow-up

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Imaging follow-up (FU) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is usually performed by periodic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of CT-FU after EVAR. Methods: In this study, 279 of 304 consecutive patients (261 mate, aged 74 years (interquartile range (IQR): 70-79 years) with a median abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter of 58 mm (IQR: 53-67 mm)) underwent at least one of the yearly CT scans and plain abdominal films after EVAR. All patients received Zenith stent-grafts for non-ruptured AAAs at a single institution. Patients were considered asymptomatic when a re-intervention was done solely due to an imaging FU finding. The data were prospectively entered in a computer database and retrospectively analysed. Results: As a follow-up, 1167 CT scans were performed at a median of 54 months (IQR: 34-74 months) after EVAR. Twenty-seven patients exhibited postoperative AAA expansion (a 5-year expansion-free rate of 88 +/- 2%), and 57 patients underwent 78 postoperative re-interventions with a 5-year secondary success rate of 91 +/- 2%. Of the 279 patients, 26 (9.3%) undergoing imaging FU benefitted from the yearly CT scans, since they had re-interventions based on asymptomatic imaging findings: AAA diameter expansion with or without endoleaks (n = 18), kink in the stent-graft limbs (n = 4), endoleak type III due to stent-graft limb separation without simultaneous AAA expansion In = 2), isolated common iliac artery expansion (n = 1) and superior mesenteric artery malperfusion due to partial coverage by the stent-graft fabric (n = 1). Conclusions: Less than 10% of the patients benefit from the yearly CT-FU after EVAR. Only one re-intervention due to partial coverage of a branch by the stent-graft would have been delayed if routine FU had been based on simple diameter measurements and plain abdominal radiograph. This suggests that less-frequent CT is sufficient in the majority of patients, which may simplify the FU protocol, reduce radiation exposure and the total costs of EVAR. Contrast-enhanced CT scans continue, nevertheless, to be critical when re-interventions are planned. (C) 2008 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available