4.5 Review

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm reduces overall mortality in men. A meta-analysis of the mid- and long-term effects of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms

Journal

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.03.006

Keywords

population; screening; abdominal aortic aneurysms; mortality; meta-analysis; systematic review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Four randomised controlled trials of screening older men for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) have been completed. A meta-anatysis was performed to examine the pooled effects of screening on both mid- and long-term AAA-retated and total mortatity, and operations for AAA. Methods: Pooled mid-term (31/2-5 years) and Long term (7-15 years) effects were calculated as odds-ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals in fixed effect models. Long-term data from the West Australian trial were limited to all-caurse deaths. Heterogeneity between the studies was assessed by the chi 2- test. In cases of heterogeneity, random effect models were used. Results: The pooled mid-term analysis showed the offer of screening caused a significant reduction in AAA related mortality (OR = 0.56, 95% C.I. 0.44,0.72), and emergency operations (OR = 0.55, 95% C.I.: 0.39; 0.76), white the number of elective operations increased significantly (OR = 3.27, 95% C.I.: 2.14; 5.00). Overall mortality was reduced, but not significantly (OR = 0.94, 95% C.I.: 0.86; 1.02). The long-term results also showed a significant reduction in AAA-retated mortality (OR = 0.47, 95% C.I.: 0.25; 0.90), overall mortality (OR = 0.94, 95% C.I.: 0.92; 0.97) and emergency operations (OR = 0.48, 95% C.I.: 0.28; 0.83), white the number of elective operations increased significantly (OR = 2.81, 95% C.I.: 2.40; 3.30). Conclusion: Population screening for AAA reduces AAA-retated and overall mortality, however local differences may exits which could influence cost effectiveness of screening. (C) 2008 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available