4.8 Article

What Makes the Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction on N-Doped Ta2O5 Efficient: Insights from Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 137, Issue 35, Pages 11517-11525

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b07454

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0014429]
  2. Advanced Catalytic Transformation Program for Carbon Utilization (ACT-C) - Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0014429] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent experimental studies demonstrated that photocatalytic CO2 reduction by Ru catalysts assembled on N-doped Ta2O3 surface is strongly dependent on the nature of the anchor group with which the Ru complexes are attached to the substrate. We report a comprehensive atomistic analysis of electron transfer dynamics in electroneutral Ru(di-X-bpy) (CO)(2)Cl-2 complexes with X = COOH and PO3H2 attached to the N-Ta2O5 substrate. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics simulations indicate that the electron transfer is faster in complexes with COOH anchors than in complexes with PO3H2 groups, due to larger nonadiabatic coupling. Quantum coherence counteracts this effect, however, to a small extent. The COOH anchor promotes the transfer with significantly higher frequency modes than PO3H2, due to both lighter atoms (C vs P) and stronger bonds (double vs single). The acceptor state delocalizes onto COOH, but not PO3H2, further favoring electron transfer in the COOH system. At the same time, the COOH anchor is prone to decomposition, in contrast to PO3H2, making the former show smaller turnover numbers in some cases. These theoretical predictions are consistent with recent experimental results, legitimating the proposed mechanism of the electron transfer. We emphasize the role of anchor stability, nonadiabatic coupling, and quantum coherence in determining the overall efficiency of artificial photocatalytic systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available