4.5 Article

Carpal tunnel syndrome assessed with diffusion tensor imaging: Comparison with electrophysiological studies of patients and healthy volunteers

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 81, Issue 11, Pages 3378-3383

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.01.008

Keywords

Carpal tunnel syndrome; Diffusion tensor imaging; Electrophysiological test; Fractional anisotropy; Apparent diffusion coefficient

Funding

  1. National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Taiwan [NCKU-9801001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main goal of this study was to investigate the applicability of parameters derived from diffusion tension imaging (DTI) in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Forty subjects were recruited, of which 19 were normal controls and 21 belonged to the CTS group. DTI of median nerves evaluated at 4 levels of the wrist (distal radius, pisiform bone, middle portion of the carpal tunnel, and hamate bone) and conventional MRI of the wrist was performed in normal and CTS subjects in two finger postures (extension and flexion). Fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were derived from DTI, and parameters related to abnormal hyperintensity of the median nerve were derived from conventional MRI. Electrophysiological tests, including nerve conduction velocity and F wave were also performed for comparison. The results of FA and ADC measurements did not depend on the measuring location and finger posture. Mean FA was decreased while mean ADC was increased by CTS. FA and ADC at the middle portion of the carpal tunnel was 0.47 +/- 0.05 and 1.37 +/- 0.12 (x10(-3)mm(2)/s) for the control group and 0.42 +/- 0.04 and 1.50 +/- 0.15 (x10(-3)mm(2)/s) for the CTS group, respectively. The linear correlations of FA and ADC versus electrophysiological indicators of CTS were significant (R-2 ranged from 0.09 to 0.36), indicating FA and ADC from DTI had significant correlation with the existence and severity of CTS. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available