4.5 Article

Frequency and significance of pulmonary nodules on thin-section CT in patients with extrapulmonary malignant neoplasms

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 81, Issue 1, Pages 152-157

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.013

Keywords

Multi-row detector computed tomography; Pulmonary nodule; Lung neoplasms; Nodule characterization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To determine the frequency and significance of pulmonary nodules detected on thin-section CT in patients with extrapulmonary malignant neoplasms. Materials and methods: The institutional review board approved this study. This study retrospectively evaluated 308 patients with extrapulmonary carcinomas or sarcomas and had undergone thin-section chest CT (2 mm slice thickness) for staging. Three radiologists identified non-calcified nodules and evaluated the size, the growth and the distance from the nearest pleural surface. The characteristics of the nodules were defined based on the results of either a diagnostic biopsy or nodule growth. Results: One or more non-calcified pulmonary nodules were detected in 75% of the patients (233/ 308). One hundred and thirty-seven of these patients had nodules that met the criteria of either benign or malignant nodules. Nodules smaller than 10 mm were more likely to be benign, whereas those 10 mm or greater were more likely to be malignant (22/ 26, 85%; P <.0001). Most nodules less than 10 mm from the pleura were benign (91%), whereas approximately half of the nodules 10 mm or more away from the pleura were malignant (20/ 43, 47%; P <.0001). Patients with melanoma, sarcoma, or testicular carcinoma were more likely to have malignant nodules. A multivariable analysis demonstrated the nodule size (P <.0001) and distance from the pleura were predictive of malignancy. Conclusion: The nodule detection rate on thin-section CT in patients with extrapulmonary malignancy is high. Most of the nodules smaller than 10 mm or less than 10 mm from the pleura are benign. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available