4.5 Review

Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, children and adults: A systematic review

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages E142-E148

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.10.007

Keywords

Sensitivity; Specificity; Magnetic resonance imaging; Autopsy; Economic evaluation; Costing; Parental attitudes; Systematic review

Funding

  1. United Kingdom Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres
  2. UK Department of Health and Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, University College Hospital
  3. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) [SRF/08/01/018]
  4. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  5. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [V0912] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine, in a systematic review, the diagnostic accuracy, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of less invasive autopsy by post-mortem MR imaging, in fetuses, children and adults. We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane library and reference lists to identify all studies comparing post-mortem MR imaging with conventional autopsy, published between January 1990 and March 2009. 539 abstracts were identified; 15 papers met the inclusion criteria; data from 9 studies were extracted (total: 146 fetuses, 11 children and 24 adults). In accurately identifying the final cause of death or most clinically significant abnormality, post-mortem MR imaging had a sensitivity and specificity of 69% (95% CI-56%, 80%) and 95% (95% CI-88%, 98%) in fetuses, and 28% (95% CI-13%, 47%) and 64% (95% CI-23%, 94%) in children and adults, respectively; however the published data is limited to small, heterogenous and poorly designed studies. Insufficient data is available on acceptability and economic evaluation of post-mortem MR imaging. Well designed, large, prospective studies are required to evaluate the accuracy of post-mortem MR imaging, before it can be offered as a clinical tool. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available