Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages 50-58Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.039
Keywords
Positron emission tomography; Cost-effectiveness; Lung cancer
Funding
- DHSSPSNI Research and Development Office
- Research Council
- Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- ESRC [ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Pre-operative assessment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major application of positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Despite substantial evidence of diagnostic accuracy, relatively little attention has been paid to its effects on patient outcomes. This paper addresses this by extending an existing decision model to include patient-elicited utilities. Patients and methods: A decision-tree model of the effect of FDG-PET on pre-operative staging was converted to a Markov model. Utilities for futile and appropriate thoracotomy were elicited from 75 patients undergoing staging investigation for NSCLC. The decision model was then used to estimate the expected value of perfect information (EVPI) associated with three sources of uncertainty-the accuracy of PET, the accuracy of CT and the patient related utility of a futile thoracotomy. Results: The model confirmed the apparent cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET and indicated that the EVPI associated with the utility of futile thoracotomy considerably exceeds that associated with measures of accuracy. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of patient related utilities in assessing the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic technologies. In the specific case of PET for pre-operative staging of NSCLC, future research effort should focus on such elicitation, rather than further refinement of accuracy estimates. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available