4.5 Article

Healthy action against poverty: a descriptive analysis of food redistribution charity clients in Berlin, Germany

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 721-726

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr095

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The socio-economic gap and its associated health inequalities are increasing in Germany. Actions against poverty include the redistribution of foods through charities. One project supported by the main German food redistribution charity is offering fresh produce including mostly fruits, vegetables and bread to people receiving welfare in Berlin, Germany. Methods: Through retrospective analysis of monthly visits (from January 2006 to June 2010) data from 45 surplus food redistribution points was examined. Clients' health status and health behaviour were examined using self-report questionnaires. Results: On average, 10 485 people visited the 45 food redistribution points weekly. A monthly increase of similar to 900 additional clients per week over all distribution points could be observed since 2006. The percentage of retirees (28.2%), single parents (20.6%) and families with children (29.5%) was high. The results of the self-report questionnaires (n = 101) revealed a sample population with a high percentage of smokers (59.4%) and moderate to heavy alcohol consumers (58.8%). Buying additional fruits and vegetables to those received through distribution points and eating breakfast regularly was associated with significantly better self- rated health status. Conclusion: Especially, vulnerable groups appear to supplement their diet with fresh produce from food redistribution points. The health status of the sample population is somewhat different from the German population with more unhealthy behavioural patterns. Future research is necessary to further investigate this impoverished population with increased health risks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available