4.4 Article

A method to monitor airborne Venturia inaequalis ascospores using volumetric spore traps and quantitative PCR

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 140, Issue 3, Pages 527-541

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-014-0486-6

Keywords

Molecular detection; Monitoring; Airborne inoculum; Real time PCR

Funding

  1. Hortgro Science
  2. National Research Foundation
  3. Claude Leon foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apple scab caused by the fungus Venturia inaequalis can result in significant crop losses if not managed effectively. Sanitation as part of an integrated management strategy aims to significantly reduce primary inoculum to lower the disease pressure. This study evaluates the possibility of molecular detection and quantification of ascospore discharge and the use of this method to test for efficacy of orchard sanitation treatments. A method to detect and quantify airborne ascospores was developed using volumetric spore traps (VSTs). V. inaequalis specific primers were tested on daily VST samples from two orchard sections (leaf litter removed compared to leaf litter left) during spring. A molecular method to detect and quantify ascospores was tested by amplifying genomic regions of the mitochondrial CYP51A1 gene, and the ITS region using SYBRA (R) green. Timing of ascospore discharge was compared to predicted infection risk and a degree day model using weather data. The average spore detection limit was estimated to be at levels of 1 pg mu l(-1) DNA (approximately 37 ascospores) per daily spore trap reading using CYP51A1 primers. Using the CYP51A1 primer pair, primary inoculum was estimated to be 51 % lower in the orchard sections where leaves had been removed, indicating that this method could be used to evaluate the efficacy of alternative control strategies such as leaf removal to reduce potential ascospore dose. This is the first report of combining VSTs and quantitative PCR to monitor airborne V. inaequalis ascospores.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available