4.4 Article

Isolation, screening and identification of antagonistic downy mildew endophytic bacteria from cucumber

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages 847-857

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-013-0293-5

Keywords

Endophytic bacteria; Cucumber downy mildew; Antagonistic action; Bacillus asahii

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170035]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong [ZR2010CQ042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cucumber is a common vegetable all over the world; however, its production is seriously affected by cucumber downy mildew caused by Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Endophytes have great potential to control such fungal diseases. The aim of the study was to isolate, screen and identify endophytic bacteria, which show antagonistic activity to downy mildew, in cucumbers. Here, surface sterilized leaves were used for endophytic bacteria isolation. All the isolates were further screened for the antagonistic activities against P. cubensis by leaf discs assay, separate leaves assay and sporangia releasing inhibition assay. The control efficacies of the endophytic bacteria (screened above) were finally evaluated through field tests. In this study, a total of 81 endophytic bacteria were isolated from cucumber leaves sampled at blossoming and fruiting stages, respectively, among which, six (strains CE1, CE8, CE9, Y1, Y2 and Y22) were tested for their strong antagonistic activity in vitro. In the field test, strain CE8, identified as belonging to Bacillus sp. based on 16S rDNA phylogenetic analysis, showed a strong control efficacy of 42.1 %, a value almost two times as high as that using 69 % metalaxyl-mancozeb WG, a widely used antifungal chemical in China. Based on the results above, CE8 was finally screened out for its great potential in cucumber downy mildew control, implicating a powerful value of the strain in the production practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available