4.4 Article

Phylogeny, diversity, and species delimitation in some species of the Xiphinema americanum-group complex (Nematoda: Longidoridae), as inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences and morphology

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 134, Issue 3, Pages 561-597

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-012-0039-9

Keywords

Bayesian inference; Cryptic species; Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI); Dagger nematodes; Maximum likelihood; rDNA; New geographic record; Virus vector

Funding

  1. 'Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion' of Spain [AGL2009-06955]
  2. 'Consejeria de Economia, Innvovacion y Ciencia' from Junta de Andalucia [AGR-136]
  3. European Social Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During nematode surveys in southern Spain and Italy 14 populations of Xiphinema species tentatively identified as Xiphinema americanum-group were detected. Morphological and morphometrical studies identified three new species and six known Xiphinema americanum-group species, viz.: Xiphinema parabrevicolle n. sp., Xiphinema parapachydermum n. sp., Xiphinema paratenuicutis n. sp., Xiphinema duriense, Xiphinema incertum, Xiphinema opisthohysterum, Xiphinema pachtaicum, Xiphinema rivesi, and Xiphinema santos. The Xiphinema americanum-group is the most difficult Xiphinema species group for diagnosis since the morphology is very conservative and morphometric characters often overlap. This group includes vectors of several important plant pathogenic viruses that cause significant damage to a wide range of agricultural crops. Molecular characterisation of these species using D2-D3 expansion regions of 28S rRNA, 18S rRNA, ITS1-rRNA and the protein-coding mitochondrial gene, cytochrome oxidase c subunit 1 was carried out and maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analysis were used to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships among these species and with other Xiphinema americanum-group species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available