4.4 Article

Carnation Fusarium wilt suppression in four composts

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages 425-433

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-008-9380-4

Keywords

Biological control; Compost; Dianthus cariophyllus; Fusarium oxysporum; f. sp dianthi; Soilless

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia [AGL2002-04313-C03-03]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of Spain [AGL2005-08137-C03-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fusarium wilt is now a major disease of carnation crops worldwide. Methyl bromide, which is used to remedy it, is environmentally unsafe. An alternative approach integrated into biological control is to grow crops in suppressive media. Suppressiveness of seven plant growth media to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. dianthi was evaluated in bioassays with carnation (Dianthus cariophyllus) cv. Medea. These media were: (1) grape marc compost, (2) cork compost, (3) olive oil husk + cotton gin trash composted and mixed with rice husk, (4) spent mushroom compost mixed with peat, (5) coir fibre, (6) light peat and (7) vermiculite. In order to look for carnation Fusarium wilt suppressiveness indicators, growth medium pH and beta-glucosidase activity were evaluated. Furthermore, F. oxysporum populations were measured in plant growth media at the beginning and end of bioassays. The compost media showed a range of suppressiveness in comparison with peat. Grape marc compost was the most effective plant growth medium in suppressing carnation Fusarium wilt. On the other hand coir fibre, peat and vermiculite were conducive for this disease. beta-glucosidase activity and pH were positively correlated with disease severity as in other reports for tomato. Therefore, these two parameters are good indicators for carnation Fusarium wilt suppressiveness, and possibly for other F. oxysporum pathosystems. All composts showed similar F. oxysporum populations at the end of the bioassays to peat and vermiculite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available