Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 277-290Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09670260902749159
Keywords
SSU; diatom phylogeny; diatom classification; Coscinodiscophyceae; Mediophyceae; Bacillariophyceae
Categories
Funding
- NSF [EF 0629410]
- Jane and Roland Blumberg Centennial Professorship in Molecular Evolution
- NIH [1F32GM080079-01A1, GM067317]
- NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM067317, F32GM080079] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A recent reclassification of diatoms based on phylogenies recovered using the nuclear-encoded small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene contains three major classes, Coscinodiscophyceae, Mediophyceae and the Bacillariophyceae (the CMB hypothesis). We evaluated this with a sequence alignment of 1336 protist and heterokont algae SSU rRNAs, which includes 673 diatoms. Sequences were aligned to maintain structural elements conserved within this dataset. Parsimony analysis rejected the CMB hypothesis, albeit weakly. Morphological data are also incongruent with this recent CMB hypothesis of three diatom clades. We also re-analysed a recently published dataset that purports to support the CMB hypothesis. Our re-analysis found that the original analysis had not converged on the true bipartition posterior probability distribution, and rejected the CMB hypothesis. Thus we conclude that a reclassification of the evolutionary relationships of the diatoms according to the CMB hypothesis is premature.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available