4.7 Article

The ameliorating effect of rosiglitazone on experimental nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is associated with regulating adiponectin receptor expression in rats

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 650, Issue 1, Pages 384-389

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.09.082

Keywords

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; Rosiglitazone; Adiponectin; Receptor; Rats

Funding

  1. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation of China [05ZR14156]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is associated with insulin resistance partly due to reduced levels of circulating adiponectin the role of adiponectin receptors including adiponectin receptor 1 and adiponectin receptor 2 in adipose tissues in NASH remains controversial The present study showed that there was a marked decline in adiponectin receptor 1 and adiponectin receptor 2 expressions in liver and visceral fat and these expressions were elevated in muscle of NASH rats 12 weeks after oral administration of a high-fat diet An 8 week continuous treatment with rosiglitazone a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma (PPAR gamma) agonist improved the histological lesions markedly in liver of NASH rats and concurrently increased mRNA and protein expressions of adiponectin receptor 1 and adiponectin receptor 2 in liver and visceral fat with down regulation of the two receptors in muscle There was a negative correlation between the ratio of adiponectin receptors/beta actin protein and serum TNF-alpha in the liver and visceral fat and a positive correlation in muscle Additionally rosiglitazone increased circulating adiponectin which was negatively correlated with serum TNF-a These results indicated that rosiglitazone improved NASH by directly modulating adiponectin receptor 1 and adiponectin receptor 2 in various adipose tissues or indirectly possibly via decreasing serum TNF alpha (C) 2010 Elsevier BV All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available