4.7 Article

Unique agonist-bound cannabinoid CB1 receptor conformations indicate agonist specificity in signaling

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 581, Issue 1-2, Pages 19-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.11.053

Keywords

trafficking; G proteins; PWR spectroscopy; functional selectivity

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R21 DA018748-02, P01 DA006284, P01 DA006284-17] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cannabinoid drugs differ in their rank order of potency to produce analgesia versus other central nervous system effects. We propose that these differences are due to unique agonist-bound cannabinoid CB1 receptor conformations that exhibit different affinities for individual subsets of intracellular signal transduction pathways. In order to test this hypothesis, we have used plasmon-waveguide resonance (PAIR) spectroscopy, a sensitive method that can provide direct information about ligand-protein and protein-protein interactions, and can detect conformational changes in lipid-embedded proteins. A recombinant epitope-tagged human cannabinoid CB1 receptor was expressed in insect Sf9 cells, solubilized and purified using two-step affinity chromatography. The purified receptor was incorporated into a lipid bilayer on the surface of the PWR resonator. PWR spectroscopy demonstrated that cannabinoid agonists exhibit high affinity (K-D = 0.2 +/- 0.03 nM and 2 +/- 0.4 nM for CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212-2, respectively) for the purified epitope tagged hCB(1) receptor. Interestingly however, these structurally different cannabinoid agonists shifted the PWR spectra in opposite directions, indicating that CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212-2 binding leads to different hCB(1) receptor conformations. Furthermore, PWR experiments also indicated that these CP 55,940-and WIN 55,212-bound hCB(1) receptor conformations exhibit slightly different affinities to an inhibitory G protein heterotrimer, G(il) (K-D = 27 +/- 8 nM and K-D = 10.7 +/- 4.7 nM, respectively), whereas they strikingly differ in their ability to activate this G protein type. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available