4.7 Article

Antinociceptive effect of novel trihalomethyl-substituted pyrazoline methyl esters in formalin and hot-plate tests in mice

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 581, Issue 1-2, Pages 86-96

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.11.042

Keywords

antinociception; pyrazoline methyl ester derivatives; hot-plate; formalin test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the antinociceptive potential of four novel pyrazoline methyl ester compounds on chemical and thermal models of pain in mice. The following 5-trihalomethylated-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole methyl ester compounds were tested: 3-methyl-5-trifluoromethyl-(MPF3), 4-methyl-5-trifluoromethyl-(MPF4), 3-methyl-5-trichloromethyl-(MPC13) and 4-methyl-5-trichloromethyl-(MPC14). MPF3, MPF4, MPC13 and MPC14 (0.03-1.0 mmol/kg) given intraperitoneally decreased neurogenic and inflammatory phases of nociception in the formalin test. Moreover, MPF3, MPF4, MPC13, MPC14 (0.1-1.0 mmol/kg) and dipyrone (1.5 mmol/kg) also produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the hot-plate test. However, MPF3, MPF4, MPC13 and MPC14 did not impair motor coordination in the rotarod test or spontaneous locomotion in the open field test. The antinociceptive effect of MPF4 (1.0 mmol/kg, i.p.) was reversed by the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (2 mg/kg, i.p.), but not by the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonist yohimbine (0.15 mg/kg, i.p.) or by p-chlorophenylalanine ethyl ester (PCPA, 300 mg/kg, i.p.) treatment. In contrast to morphine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), MPF4 given daily for up to 8 days did not generate a tolerance to its antinociceptive effect. However, similar to morphine (I I mg/kg, i.p.), MPF4 reduced gastrointestinal transit in mice. Taken together these results demonstrate that these novel pyrazoline methyl esters tested may be promising prototypes of additional mild analgesics. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available