4.7 Article

Injected nanoparticles: The combination of experimental systems to assess cardiovascular adverse effects

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.02.001

Keywords

Blood pressure; Nanoparticles; Telemetry; Wire myography; Aorta ring; Rat

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [133407, 118002, 217547, 217547118013, 117906, 931444]
  2. University of Eastern Finland (NAMBER NAMBIO)
  3. Northern-Savo Cultural foundation
  4. M.V. Lomonosov State University Program of Development
  5. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [133407, 217547, 117906, 118002, 217547, 117906, 118002, 133407] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When nanocarriers are used for drug delivery they can often achieve superior therapeutic outcomes over standard drug formulations. However, concerns about their adverse effects are growing due to the association between exposure to certain nanosized particles and cardiovascular events. Here we examine the impact of intravenously injected drug-free nanocarriers on the cardiovasculature at both the systemic and organ levels. We combine in vivo and in vitro methods to enable monitoring of hemodynamic parameters in conscious rats, assessments of the function of the vessels after sub-chronic systemic exposure to nanocarriers and evaluation of the direct effect of nanocarriers on vascular tone. We demonstrate that nanocarriers can decrease blood pressure and increase heart rate in vivo via various mechanisms. Depending on the type, nanocarriers induce the dilation of the resistance arteries and/or change the responses induced by vasoconstrictor or vasodilator drugs. No direct correlation between physicochemical properties and cardiovascular effects of nanoparticles was observed. The proposed combination of methods empowers the studies of cardiovascular adverse effects of the nanocarriers. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available