4.7 Article

Pulmonary delivery and tissue distribution of aerosolized antisense 2′-O-Methyl RNA containing nanoplexes in the isolated perfused and ventilated rat lung

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.04.022

Keywords

2 '-O-Methyl RNA; Nanoplexes; Inhalation; Isolated perfused and ventilated rat lung; Targeted therapy

Funding

  1. BMBF [0315280C]
  2. German Cancer Aid, Bonn, Germany [107541]
  3. Interfaculty Center for Pharmacogenomics and Drug Research (ICEPHA) [12-0-0, 22-0-0]
  4. Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pulmonary delivery of drugs, particularly in the treatment of lung cancer, is an attractive strategy for future targeted therapy. In this context, inhalation of nanoplexes might offer a new mode for drug delivery in gene therapy. However, limited data are currently available demonstrating pulmonary delivery, cellular uptake as well as local tolerability in lung tissue. The aim of this study was to elucidate the pulmonary delivery, tissue distribution and local tolerability of aerosolized chitosan-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) based nanoplexes containing antisense 2'-O-Methyl RNA (OMR). Therefore, an aerosol of OMR-nanoplexes or OMR alone was administered intratracheally using the model of the isolated perfused and ventilated rat lung. Localization of OMR in rat lung tissue was examined by immunohistochemistry. Administration of the OMR-nanoplex formulation resulted in significantly higher cellular OMR uptake of the respiratory epithelium in contrast to the administration of OMR alone, indicating that drug administration via aerosolized nanoplexes is able to target lung tissue. No prominent changes in lung physiology parameters were observed following inhalation, suggesting good local tolerability of OMR-nanoplex formulation. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available