4.6 Article

Proniosome-derived niosomes for tacrolimus topical ocular delivery: In vitro cornea permeation, ocular irritation, and in vivo anti-allograft rejection

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 115-123

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.05.020

Keywords

Tacrolimus; Proniosome; Niosome; Ocular delivery; Allograft rejection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to develop proniosome-derived niosomes for topical ophthalmic delivery of Tacrolimus (FK506). The FK506 loaded proniosomes containing poloxamer 188 and lecithin as surfactants, cholesterol as a stabilizer, and minimal amount of ethanol and trace water reconstituted to niosomes prior to use. The stability of FK506 loaded proniosomes was assessed, and the morphology, size, zeta potential, surface tension, and entrapment efficiency of the derived niosomes were characterized, indicating they were feasible for instillation in the eyes. The in vitro permeation of FK506 through the freshly excised rabbit cornea, the cumulative permeation amount of FK506 from niosomes, and the drug retention in the cornea all exhibited significant increase as compared to 0.1% FK506 commercial ointments. The in vivo ocular irritation test of 0.1% FK506 loaded niosomes instilled 4 times per day in rat eyes for 21 consecutive days showed no irritation and good biocompatibility with cornea. The in vivo anti-allograft rejection assessment was performed in a Sprague-Dawley (SD) rat corneal xenotransplantation model. The results showed treatment with 0.1% FK506 loaded niosomes delayed the occurrence of corneal allograft rejection and significantly prolonged the median survival time of corneal allografts to 13.86 +/- 0.80 days as compared with those treated with 1% Cyclosporine (CsA) eye drops, drug-free niosomes, or untreated. In conclusion, the proniosome-derived niosomes may be a promising vehicle for effective ocular drug delivery of FK506. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available