4.6 Article

Pharmacological effect of orally delivered insulin facilitated by multilayered stable nanoparticles

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 41, Issue 3-4, Pages 556-563

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2010.08.009

Keywords

Insulin; Nanoparticles; Bioactivity; Hypoglycemic effect; Bioavailabiliry; Intestinal uptake

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia of Portugal [SFR/BD/30644/2006]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intestinal uptake, insulinemia and hypoglycemic effect of orally delivered insulin encapsulated in poly-electrolytically stable nanoparticles were evaluated in streptozotocin-induced Wistar diabetic rats. Nanoparticles with 396 nm mean diameter were formed by alginate and dextran sulfate nucleating around calcium and binding to poloxamer, stabilized by chitosan, and subsequently coated with albumin. The resulting negatively charged nanoparticles retained insulin bioactivity and enhanced pharmacological availability by shielding insulin from enzymatic degradation and through chemical and physical facilitation of permeation through the intestinal membrane. Insulin nanoencapsulated through a simplified method avoiding harsh conditions and organic solvents, reduced plasma glucose levels to 40% of the basal values with a sustained hypoglycemic effect over 24h. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated at a dose of 50IU/kg nanoencapsulated insulin, and 13% oral bioavailability showed a threefold increase in comparison to free insulin. Confocal microscopy showed internalization of nanoencapsulated insulin in the small intestinal mucosa using independently labeled insulin-FITC and alginate-RBITC. Therefore the nanoformulation facilitated the oral delivery of insulin, and potentially that of other therapeutic proteins. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available