4.6 Article

Pharmacokinetics of a new 10% intravenous immunoglobulin in patients receiving replacement therapy for primary immunodeficiency

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 37, Issue 3-4, Pages 272-278

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2009.02.014

Keywords

Immunodeficiency; Intravenous immunoglobulin; IVIG

Funding

  1. CSL Behring, Bern, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is used in treating immunodeficiencies and autoimmune or inflammatory disorders. As manufacturing processes and storage can alter IgG molecules, pharmacokinetic assessments are important for new preparations. Thus, we studied pharmacokinetics of IgPro10, a new 10% liquid Wig product stabilised with L-proline, in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) and X-linked agammaglobulinaemia (XIA). Patients received lgPro10 for >= 4 months (median dose of 444 mg/kg, at 3- or 4-week intervals). Median total IgG serum concentrations increased from 10.2 g/l pre-infusion to 23.2 g/l at infusion end. Serum IgG concentrations decreased in a biphasic manner; median terminal half-life was 36.6 days. Median half-lives were 33.2 for IgG(1), 36.3 for IgG(2), 25.9 for IgG(3) and 36.4 days for IgG(4). Specific antibody concentrations (anti-CMV, anti-Hemophilus influenzae type B, anti-tetanus toxoid and anti-Streptococcus pneumoniae) decreased with median half-lives of 22.3-30.5 days. IgPro10 pharmacokinetics were similar in patients with CVID and XLA, although patients with CVID showed higher levels of anti-tetanus and anti-S. pneumoniae antibodies than patients with XLA, suggesting residual specific antibody production. IgPro10 pharmacokinetics fulfilled expectations for and were similar to intact IgG products. Administration of IgPro10 at 3- or 4-week intervals achieved sufficient plasma concentrations of total IgG, IgG subclasses and antibodies specific to important pathogens. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available