4.6 Article

Computer simulations of bioequivalence trials: Selection of design and analyte in BCS drugs with first-pass hepatic metabolism: Part II. Non-linear kinetics

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 147-156

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2008.10.023

Keywords

Bioequivalence; First-pass metabolism; Single dose; Steady state; BCS

Funding

  1. EU [NOE LSMB-CT-005137]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this work is to use a computer simulation approach to define the most sensitive analyte and study design of the in vivo bioequivalence study for all types of Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) drugs undergoing first-pass hepatic metabolism under non-linear conditions. A semi-physiological model was developed in NONMEM VI to simulate bioequivalence trials. Eight classes from class I to IV BCS drugs (with high or low intrinsic clearance) in two variability scenarios (high-low) and in six drug products of decreasing quality were simulated in non-linear conditions to complete a total of 96 scenarios that were tested in single dose and steady state studies and compared with the previous results obtained under linear conditions. Parent drug in single dose is the most sensitive analyte and study design for bioequivalence trials in almost all the studied scenarios. However, this general rule has an exception not only in drugs with low permeability (class III and IV) and low intrinsic clearance, for which parent drug in steady state showed differences in the rate of exposure (Cmax) and also in some occasions in the extent of absorption (AUC), that are not reflected with the same sensitivity in the single dose scenario, but it could also be possible for Cmax in class III drugs with high intrinsic clearance. Metabolite data shows less sensitivity detect differences in biopharmaceutics quality in most of the scenarios or it gives the same information as the parent compound. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available