4.1 Article

A Case with Bladder Exstrophy and Unbalanced X Chromosome Rearrangement

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 353-359

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1349056

Keywords

array-CGH; bladder exstrophy; MID1; SHOX; X chromosome rearrangement

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. HRH Crown Princess Lovisa Foundation
  3. Stockholm City Council
  4. Foundation Frimurare Barnhuset Stockholm
  5. Anders Otto Swards Foundation/Ulrika Eklunds Foundation
  6. Magn Bergvall Foundation
  7. Stiftelsen Samariten
  8. Stiftelsen Barnavard
  9. Karolinska Institutet
  10. Swedish Society of Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Bladder exstrophy is a rare congenital malformation of the bladder and is believed to be a complex disorder with genetic and environmental background. We describe a young adult female with an isolated bladder exstrophy and with an X chromosome aberration. Patients and Methods Karyotyping identified an X chromosome rearrangement that was further characterized with array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and confirmed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Results The identified X chromosome rearrangement in our index patient consists of a gain of chromosomal material in region Xq26.3-> qter and loss in region Xp22.12->pter. This aberration was also carried by her mother and sister, none with bladder exstrophy. All three have a disproportionate short stature, as expected due to the deletion of one of the copies of the SHOX gene on Xp22.3. X-inactivation studies revealed a complete skewed inactivation pattern in carriers. Crossover events in the maternal germline furthermore resulted in different genetic material on the rearranged X chromosome between the index patient and her sister. Conclusion Our findings suggest an X-linked genetic risk factor for bladder exstrophy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available