4.4 Article

Pain and somatic symptoms are sequelae of sexual assault: Results of a prospective longitudinal study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 559-566

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00395.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources [UL1RR025747]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundCross-sectional studies have shown that chronic musculoskeletal pain and somatic symptoms are frequently reported by sexual assault (SA) survivors; however, prospective studies examining pain and somatic symptoms in the months after SA have not been performed. MethodsWomen SA survivors 18 years of age or older who presented for care within 48h of SA were recruited. Pain in eight body regions (head and face, neck, breast, arms, abdomen, back, genital and pelvic, and legs) and 21 common somatic symptoms (e.g., headache, nausea, insomnia, persistent fatigue) were assessed (0-10 numeric rating scale in each body region) at the time of presentation, 1-week, 6-week and 3-month interview. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms were assessed at the 6-week and 3-month interview. ResultsClinically significant new or worsening pain (CSNWP) symptoms were common among study participants 6weeks after SA [43/74, 58% (95% CI, 47-69%)] and 3months after SA [40/67, 60% (95% CI, 48-71%)] and generally occurred in regions not experiencing trauma. Women SA survivors also experienced an increased burden of many common somatic symptoms: 8/21 (38%) and 11/21 (52%) common somatic symptoms showed a significant increase in severity 6weeks and 3months after SA, respectively. Correlations between PTSD, CSNWP and somatic symptoms were only low to moderate, suggesting that these outcomes are distinct. ConclusionsNew and/or clinically worsening pain and somatic symptoms, lasting at least 3months, are sequelae of SA. Further studies investigating pain and somatic symptoms after SA are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available