4.4 Article

Determinants of adolescent health care use for low back pain

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages 1467-1476

Publisher

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00178.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [129504]
  2. Medical Research Council [G0801056B] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [129504, 129504] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Recent studies have indicated that low back pain (LBP) is common already in adolescence, but only few studies have evaluated the factors that determine LBP-related health care use at this age. Methods The study population included 1987 adolescents aged 18 from the Oulu Back Study, a subcohort of the 1986 Northern Finland Birth Cohort. We used logistic regression to evaluate whether enabling resources, need factors, personal health habits or psychological problems are associated with seeking health care for LBP, among adolescents reporting LBP during the last year. Results Of the 1987 respondents, 50% of the females and 42% of the males reported having had LBP during the previous year. Of the 921 respondents with LBP, 89 (16%) females, and 59 (16%) males had consulted a health care professional. In both genders, pain intensity was strongly associated with seeking care [visual analogue scale (VAS) 810 vs. VAS 03; males: OR 16.6, 95% CI 3.872.5, females: OR 18.8 95% CI 6.356.1]. In addition, LBP-related daily activity limitations (impairment index 46 vs. 0 OR 15.7 95% CI 1.7142.5) were associated with care seeking among males. Student status was also associated with care seeking among males (OR 2.34 95% CI 1.025.36). Conclusions Approximately one out of six adolescents with LBP seeks medical care. Intensity of pain and daily activity limitations appear to be the main determinants of seeking care for LBP in adolescence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available