4.4 Article

Contribution of individual, workplace, psychosocial and physiological factors to neck pain in female office workers

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages 985-991

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.11.014

Keywords

Neck pain; Risk factors; Office work

Funding

  1. Physiotherapy Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the relative contribution of individual, workplace, psychosocial and physiological features associated with neck pain in female office workers towards developing appropriate intervention programs. Workers without disability (Neck Disability Index (NDI) score <= 8, n = 33): workers with neck pain and disability (NDI >= 9/100, n = 52) and 22 controls (women who did not work and without neck pain) participated in this study. Two logistic regression models were constructed to test the association between various measures in (1) workers with and without disability, and (2) workers Without disability and controls. Measures included those found to be significantly associated with higher NDI in our previous studies: psychosocial domains; individual factors; task demands: quantitative sensory measures and measures of motor function. In the final model, higher score on negative affectivity scale (OR = 4.47), greater activity in the neck flexors during cranio-cervical flexion (OR = 1.44), cold hyperalgesia (OR = 1.27) and longer duration of symptoms (OR = 1.19) remained significantly associated with neck pain in workers. Workers without disability and controls could only be differentiated by greater muscle activity in the cervical flexors and extensors during a typing task. No psychosocial domains remained in either regression model. These results suggest that impairments in the sensory and motor system should be considered in any assessment of the office worker with neck pain and may have stronger influences on the presenting symptoms than workplace and psychosocial features. (C) 2008 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available