4.2 Article

Electroencephalography and brain magnetic resonance imaging in asphyxia comparing cooled and non-cooled infants

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 181-190

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.09.001

Keywords

Neonate; Therapeutic hypothermia; Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; Neurodevelopmental outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim was to establish any differences in the predictive value of EEG and MRI for outcome in infants treated and not-treated with therapeutic hypothermia (HT) for perinatal asphyxia. We hypothesize that they are equally predictive and that combining both has the highest predictive value. Study design: We retrospectively compared data of infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) who received HT (n = 45) between September 2009 and December 2013 with those of infants with HIE born between January 2004 and August 2009, before HT was available (NT, n = 37). All received conventional and/or amplitude integrated EEG during the first days and early MRI (day 4-5). Associations of EEG, MRI and severe neuro-developmental outcome (death or Bayley's -2SD below mean), were tested with a multi variable logistic regression analysis, corrected for HT. Results: Forty-eight hours' EEG background pattern had a PPV of 92% and a NPV of 81% in HT, versus 100% and 58% in NT. MRI had a PPV of 71% and a NPV of 93% in HT, versus 82% and 75% in NT. The adjusted OR for adverse outcome was 0.013 (95% CI 0.002-0.154, p < 0.001) for EEG background normalization within 48 h and 32.19 (95% CI 4.84-214.25, p < 0.001) for abnormal MRI. Conclusion: The predictive value of EEG and MRI is equal in cooled and non-cooled infants with HIE. Our data show a higher predictive value (death and severe outcome) for EEG compared to MRI. In HIE, persistent abnormal EEG background pattern until 48 h, combined with abnormal early MRI is strongly predictive for poor neurodevelopment. (C) 2018 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available